Prof. Appleby's Blog

On education and professional development.

Browsing Posts published in January, 2010

#41

Comments off

That was my nickname about fifteen years ago – Number 41. It was an inside joke between me and my manager. I once told him that there was a mood developing among the team members that I could best compare to a scene in the movie Ben Hur.  Ben Hur, at one point, is serving as a galley slave on a Roman ship.  A Roman officer addresses the slaves, telling them:

“You are all condemned men. We keep you alive to serve this ship. So row well and live.”

Ben Hur was referred to simply as slave #41… and, after I offered my observation, I, too, became #41.  He would pass me in the hallways and say, “Good morning, 41″ and we’d just smile about the significance of that statement.

Some thoughtful comments from former IBM EVP Nick Donofrio:

The January 14th, 2010 edition of The Economist has an interesting article about mainframe computers.  The article is entitled Back in Fashion and provides some interesting insights into the status of mainframe technology and capabilities.

Back in Fashion

According to the article,

“IBM is also trying to attract new customers, particularly in fast-growing emerging markets. Without mainframes, India’s Housing Development Finance Corporation and the Bank of China in Hong Kong would have a hard time dealing with their explosive growth…”

The mainframe has evolved and adapted for many, many decades.  Today, it combines the same stable, robust, secure platform that large organizations have depended upon for half-a-century, while also providing a highly scalable, manageable, and affordable platform for the development of new workloads (Linux, Java, Websphere, DB2, Oracle, etc.).  And at a time when the benefits of virtualization are a dominant industry theme, the Z Series mainframe offers outstanding virtual capabilities.

An hour ago I was walking up and down the magazine section in a local bookstore, looking for the latest edition of the Economist magazine.

I didn’t find it.

I did see a copy of something called Hunter-Gatheress magazine.  I’m serious.  Talk about niche marketing.   I’m sure there’s more to it than meets the eye, but I didn’t look at it -  I just saw the title.  (You know how I like to stand up for hunter-gatherers, so, naturally, the words jumped out at me.)

Well, I started thinking again about “ancient man” and how dismissive we can be of those who lived millenia before us.

I’m not headed down that path tonight.  But I will say that just because people of a given time did not have the technological accomplishments that we have (which, by the way, I sum up as: electricity) doesn’t mean that they spoke in inarticulate grunts and struggled to draw even rudimentary inferences.  Not at all.

Throughout the ages, men have asked the same questions and wrestled with the same mysteries, and, in reading what they had to say, I feel connected to all that came before me.

I read a book several years ago entitled A War Like No Other by Victor Davis Hanson.  It’s a chronicle of the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta.   It seemed so relevant to today – to our times.  Perhaps that is because, ultimately, the issues, the conflicts, and the motives are common to all times.  They are common to the human condition.

More recently, I’ve been thinking about reading (well, finishing) Plato’s Republic. It seems like a timely choice.

I decided, though, to begin with a book entitled The Presocratics by Philip Wheelwright, believing that Plato will make more sense to me now if I first build up a better understanding of Greek thought prior to Socrates.  I’m only in chapter 1, but already I have had several “Ah!” moments.

Don’t get me wrong.  I know that philosophy does not answer the most important questions.  Nor does science.  Nor does mathematics.

But we are rational creatures and we benefit from exposing our minds to things which are reasonable, beautiful, orderly, and true.  It’s a better use of  time than much of what we do each day. (If I want to see that which is irrational, ugly, chaotic, and false, I have but to turn on the television and listen to the pundits dispute with one another).

Put a little distance between yourself and the television/computer/internet every so often.

Take time to listen to the great pieces of music; view the great works of art; read the great works of poetry and other forms of literature; learn from fields like mathematics and philosophy the habits of clear definition and careful reasoning.  It’s good to escape from technology sometimes and come back to terms with our humanity.

Play chess with a human being.  Have coffee with a good friend.  Spend an evening in conversation.

And, of course, look at the stars on a clear night.

According to an article I just read, Neanderthals seem to have pulled even with “early man” in terms of symbolic thinking.  Up until now, scientists apparently considered them to be  “cognitively inferior” because they showed no ability to think symbolically.  Evidence now suggests they were able (and willing) to collect sea shells and string them together, using them as ornaments that expressed their individuality – definitely an act of symbolic thinking.  “Early modern humans” apparently did the same thing, so Neanderthals have now tied the game and (presumably) the scientific community will get off their case!